Effectiveness of Self-Determination Skills Training on Academic Self-Regulation and Psychological Hardiness among Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Introduction
One of the main objectives of curricula is to create self-regulation ability in students and increase their perseverance and commitment to the fulfillment of academic activities. It seems that the development and improvement of the motivational skills, which provide students with the opportunities of selectivity, control, supervision, and competence exposure, can assist them with the compilation of goals, identification of the necessary steps towards goal attainment, solving of problems, and removal of the impediments to achieving these goals, and this issue is realized by increases in some skills such as self-determination. Self-determination is a metatheory about human motivation. It is evolved out of the studies on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and extensively applied to successes in relationships with parents, education, healthcare, sports, and psychotherapy. In step with the self-determination theory, humans are innately active and enjoy a natural desire for learning and growth. Recent investigations have rendered encouraging evidence respecting the effectiveness of training self-determination skills. With regard to the positive consequences of self-determination, the educational system must pave the way for students to become self-determinant. Indeed, the fostering of self-determination skills in educational environments helps students improve their quality of life, operate independently in their lives, have the maximum control over and responsibility for their lives, and increment their rate of participation in and cooperation with curriculum development and decision-making in educational processes. The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of training self-determination skills on students’ academic self-regulation (external regulation, internalized regulation, identified regulation, and internal regulation) and development of psychological hardiness (challenge, commitment, and control).
 
Research Hypothesis
1-Training self-determination skills lead to decrease of students’ extrinsic regulation, interjected regulation, identified regulation and increase of their intrinsic regulation
2-Self-determination skills training leads to increase of students’ psychological hardiness (commitment, challenge and control).
 
Research method
The current study was quasi-experimental with pre-test post-test design and control group in which self-determination skills training, was considered as independent variable, and types of academic self-regulation (extrinsic regulation, interjected regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic regulation) and dimensions of psychological hardiness (commitment, challenge and control) were considered as dependent variables. The subjects included 120 eighth-grade students in Shiraz city in the academic year of 2018-19. In order to select subjects, four schools (two girl schools and two boy schools) were selected from junior high schools. One class of eight grade was selected from every school. Classes assigned to experimental and control groups (two experimental groups and two control groups), randomly. Prior to the beginning of the training, the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Ryan & Connell, 1989) and the Personal Views Survey Questionnaire (Kobasa et al., 1990) were administered to experimental and control groups. Self-determination skills were taught to experimental groups during 10 sessions and then post-test was performed on experimental and control groups. Self-determination skills were taught through the design and application of a training package based on the principles and elements of the model (Field & Hoffman, 1994) and its adaptation to the normal student sample. In the Field and Hoffman model, these steps include knowing oneself and one's environment, valuing oneself, planning, acting, the outcome of experience, and learning.
 
Results
Data were analyzed by using statistical method of MANCOVA and ANCOVA statistical analysis methods. Findings showed self-determination skills training result to reduce extrinsic regulation, interjected regulation, and identified regulation and increase intrinsic regulation, significantly. Also, self-determination skills training increased student's psychological hardiness and its dimensions (commitment, challenge and control).
 
Discussion
     The present study presents evidence concerning the effectiveness of training self-determination skills on academic self-regulation and psychological hardiness. The majority of studies conducted in this area, especially in Iran, are correlational, which limits the possibility of the causative interpretation of the results. However, the present study measures trained self-determination skills and their effects on academic self-regulation and psychological hardiness. The results of the study revealed the importance of noticing self-determination skills in curriculum development since these skills enhance students’ self-regulation and increase their psychological hardiness. In this method, due to the learner-centered nature of the self-determination approach, students are divided into small groups and given problems that are to be solved by group work, discussion, and public participation. During this process, the problems are evaluated and analyzed by the use of discussions and negotiations. In fact, students’ senses of further belongingness to the school and class activities and interests in reviewing and revising learning processes are the consequences of these activities. Lastly, self-determination training helps individuals with better recognition of their worldviews, strengths, weaknesses, and goals. This awareness can give rise to psychological hardiness and transform them into self-regulated individuals. As practically possible, curriculums should include self-determination skills training and textbooks should contain motivational steps of self-determination skills. This can be achieved through the training of specialized and experienced educators in the field of self-determination education and the holding of part-time training workshops in schools.

Keywords


Alborzi, M. (2010). Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Academic Self-regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) in Elementary School Students. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 6(10),
Andreadakis, E., Joussemet, M., & Mageau, G. A. (2019). How to support toddlers’ autonomy: Socialization practices reported by parents. Early Education and Development, 30(3), 297-314.
Baranauskienė, I., Serdiuk, L., & Chykhantsova, O. (2016). Psychological characteristics of school-leavers’hardiness at their professional self-determination. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 2(6), 64-73.
Buhrau, D., & Sujan, M. (2014). Temporal mindsets and self-regulation: The motivation and implementation of self-regulatory behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (2), 231-244.
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Willness, C. (2005). Cultural context and psychological needs in Canada and Brazil: Testing a self-determination approach to the internalization of cultural practices, identity, and well-being. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 423-443
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York and London: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, Personality, and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19-43.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learner's engagement, achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3890-3894.
Ejei, J., Khezri, azar H., Babaei sangelaji, M., & Amani, J. (2009). A Structural Model of the Relationships between the Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support, Basic Psychological Needs, Intrinsic Motivation, and Effort. Journal of Research in Psychological Health, 2 (4), 47-56.
Field, S. L., & Hoffman, A. S. (2012). Fostering self-determination through building productive relationships in the classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 6-14.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), 159-169.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (2007). Self-determination in secondary transition assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(3), 181-190.
Garrin, J. M. (2014). Self-efficacy, self-determination, and self-regulation: The role of the fitness professional in social change agency. Journal of Social Change, 6(1), 41-54.
González, M. G., Swanson, D. P., Lynch, M., & Williams, G. C. (2016). Testing satisfaction of basic psychological needs as a mediator of the relationship between socioeconomic status and physical and mental health. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(6), 972-982.
Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children's perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508-517.
Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Life stressors and mental health. Advances in Conceptualizing Stress Resistance. In W. R Avision & I. H Gatlib (Eds.). Stress and mental health. Contemporary Issues and Prospects for the Future (pp. 213-238). Springer, Boston, MA.
Hydarinia, Z. (2015). Investigating the mediating role of psychological hardiness in the relationship between family emotional climate and student's adjustment with university. Master Thesis, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University.
Khaliq, A. A., Mwachofi, A. K., & Broyles, R. W. (2010). Physician autonomy vs. Self-Regulation: you can't have one without the other. Ethics & Medicine, 26(2), 111-120
Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: an enquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality & Social psychology, 37(1), 1-11.
Kobasa, S. O. (1990). Lessons from history: How to find the person in health psychology. In H. S. Friedman (Ed), Personality and disease, (pp. 14-37). New York: Wiley.
Leake, D., & Boone, R. (2007). Multicultural perspectives on self-determination from youth, parent, and teacher focus groups. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(2), 104-115.
Maddi, S. R. (2013). Hardiness: Turning stressful circumstance into resilient growth. Springer Briefs in Psychology.
Martin, A. J. (2003). The Student Motivation Scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 88-106.
Masten, A. S. (2009). Ordinary Magic: Lessons from Research on Resilience in Human Development. Education Canada, 49(3), 28-32.
Mirzaee, S., Kiamanesh, A., Hejazi, E., Banijamali, S. (2016). The Effect of Perceived Competence on Academic Resiliency with Mediation of Autonomous Motivation. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods, 7(25), 67-82.
Moilanen, K. L., Rasmussen, K. E., & Padilla‐Walker, L. M. (2015). Bidirectional associations between self‐regulation and parenting styles in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 246-262.
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150. ‏
Reeve, J. (2014). Understanding Motivation and Emotion. John Wiley & Sons.
Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133-147.
Ryan, R.  M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R. (2009). Self-determination theory and well-being. Social Psychology, 84(822), e848.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749.
Ryan, R. M., Ryan, W. S., Di Domenico, S. I., & Deci, E. L. (2019). The nature and the conditions of human autonomy and flourishing. The nature and the conditions of human autonomy and flourishing: Self- determination theory and basic psychological needs. The Oxford handbook of human motivation (2 Ed.)
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students' learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368-378.
Sheikholeslami, R. (2011). Mediating Effect of Life Satisfaction in the Relationship between Self-Determination and Mental Health. Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 76-89.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Shogren, K., Williams-Diehm, K., & Soukup, J. H. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between intervention to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195-210.
Wehmeyer, M., & Schwartz, M. (2016). Self-Determination and Positive Adult Outcomes: A Follow-up Study of Youth with Mental Retardation or Learning Disabilities. Except Children, 63(2), 245-5.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition. Educational Psychology, 30(4), 217-221.