Evaluating 8th Grade Math Textbook Based on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge conceptual knowledge

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Assistant Professor

Abstract

Introduction
At the present time, students need to be equipped with knowledge and flexible attitudes to be able to adapt to  rapid changes in society. Mathematics is one of the most important sciences which can develop the power of thought.  One of the factors which can play a vital role in develping students’ mathematical skill is their mathematical knowledge. Considering this, it is believed that students need to improve both their canceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics in order to be successful. Based on the previous research, conceptual knowledge involves awareness and skillful movement along special networks of  concepts, rules, algorithms, procedures, and so on. In other words, not only is conceptual knowledge concerned with what is known, i.e. knowledge of concepts, but also it can be helpful  in learning  key concepts and their  connections. Procedural knowledge is the knowledge of the steps involved in achieving different goals and is concerned with the use of skills, algorithms, techniques and methods. Indeed, procedural knowledge is a chain of sequential actions which can be taken to solve a problem and can be developed through practicing and solving specific problems. Although the two types of knowledge seem to be independent, they are in fact interrelated. In other word, these two kinds of knowledge are part of an interconnected chain, and can never be separate from each other, and are located at both ends of the knowledge spectrum. The Furthermore, they cannot develop independently and affect each other. Regarding these, many attempts have been made to investigate the relationship between the two types of knowledge. Some scholars have also been interested in exploring the causal relationship between the two, i.e. in understanding which one causes the other. For instance, theorists who believe that concepts are first formed in the mind claim that individuals acquire conceptual knowledge before procedural knowledge. In contrast, there are some other theorists who believe procedures develop before concepts and state that individuals first learn procedures for solving a problem and then the structure of concepts. Therefore, two approaches, namely the educational approach and the developmental approach, have been proposed regarding conceptual and procedural types of knowledge and the relationship between the two. It is noteworthy, however, that each approach can be considered as appropriate in teaching particular types of skills and concepts. Proponents of the educational approach believe that conceptual knowledge leads to procedural knowledge and Proponents of the Developmental approach believe that procedural knowledge leads to conceptual knowledge. Due to the fact that the ecucational system im Iran is od a centralized type,  a main criterion for improving mathematics education in the country can be curricula development and textbook authoring based on the particular needs which arise. With regard to recent changes in the content of in the 8th grade math textbookand concerning the faxtthat the textbook is used by all Iranian 8th grade students, a thorough evaluation of the textbook seems necessary.
 
Research Questions
1.         Which types of conceptual or procedural knowledge do the various sections of the 8th grade math textbook embody/pay more attention to?what is the distribution of the use of conceptual and procedural knowledge among the various sections of the 8th grade math textbook?
2-To what extent is the 8th grade math textbook focused on the connection between conceptual and procedural knowledge?
3- Is the 8th grade math textbook’s overall approach to knowledge  of an educational or a developmental type?
 
Research materials and method
This study aimed at evaluating content of the 8th grade mathematics textbook in terms of the amount of attention paid to each of conceptual and procedural types of knowledge. Accordingly, content analysis was used in order to conduct this study. The research material was the 8th grade mathematics textbook. Sample size was exactly the same as population size. In other words, i.e content analysis was done in relation to content of the whole book. Research instrument was a researcher-made content analysis scale. Then, the views and opinions of experts, maths instructors and teachers were sought in order to examine content validity of the developed scale. To assess reliability of the scale, the percentage of agreement among the coders was determined through the use of Scott’s pi(B)coefficient and the reliability coefficient value of 0.81 was obtained.
 
 
 
 
Results
Based on the the results, textbook authors had paid little attention to the connection between conceptual and procedural knowledge in the main texts, and more attention to the connection between conceptual and procedural knowledge in the activities and classroom exercises, which, of course, did not seem to be enough. Furthermore, most of the textbook's problems had also focused on the improvement of procedural knowledge.
 
Discussion
In summary, the 8th grade math textbook has held an extreme view of teaching procedures, and in most cases the emphasis has been put on increasing procedural knowledge. In addition, little attention has been paid to the connection between conceptual and procedural types of knowledge. Therefore, textbook authors need to emphasize the connection between the two types of knowledge in designing textbook activities On one hand, paying attention to the connections between familiar procedures and new concepts can help students acquire a better understanding of the concepts. On the other hand, the education system can achieve one of its major goals, i.e. making people more reflective, through helping students in development of their understanding. It is recommended, thus, that textbook authors and educators design more effective textbooks through both community and student needs assessment.
 
 

Keywords


Akbari Baluch, M. , Esmaeili, M.(2014). Content analysis math problems in the first year in junior high school based on modeling approach. 13th Conference on Mathematics Education, Tehran, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University.
Amiri, H. Pandey, Z. Khosro Abadi, H. Davoodi, Kh. Reihani, E. Seyed Salehi, M. & Sadr, M.(2017). 8th grade math textbook of junior high school, Tehran, Iranian textbooks printing and publishing company.
Asadian, S. (2018). The effect of happy and neutral classroom atmosperes on students' attitude toward mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Research, 8(1), 85-103. doi: 10.22099/jcr.2018.4950.
Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (1991). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 777.
Fauzan, A., Armiati, A., & Ceria, C. (2018). A Learning Trajectory for Teaching Social Arithmetic using RME Approach. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335, No. 1, p. 012121). IOP Publishing.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. University Of Twente [Host].
Gooya, Z. Sereshti, H. Teaching calcuiuse: problems & technology (part 1). Mathematics Education Journal, 84, 23(4),28-36.
Gholāmāzad, S. (2015). Assessment of mathematics curriculum of guidance school in Iran according to teachers perspectives. Educational Innovations, 14(1), 96-130.
Hassan Moradi, N. (2006). Entrepreneurship Management. Karaj: Institute for Research and Management education.
Hossieni, A. (2007). Investigating the effects of teachers creativity programs on students’ creativity in their school achievement, and self-belief. Educational Innovations, 6(4), 147-168.
Khoule, A., Bonsu, N. O., & El Houari, H. (2017). Impact of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge on Students Mathematics Anxiety. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(1), 8-17.
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How Does Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Improve Students’ Mathematics Cognitive Achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578.
Levin, M. (2018). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge During Strategy Construction: A Complex Knowledge Systems Perspective. Cognition and Instruction, 1-31.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: NCT M.
Piri, M., Gholipoor, R. (2018). The Study of Sixth-Grade of Primary School Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Guide Books Based on The Eight Elements of Curriculum Development. Journal of Curriculum Research, 8(1), 65-84.
Reyhāni, E., Bakhshalizādeh, S., Moaini, T. (2009). A Study on the Evolution of conceptual and procedural Knowledge of mathematics and the relationship between them. Educational Innovations, 8(1), 27-51.
Rezaei, A. Reyhāni, E. & Yaftian, N. (2014). What strategies do 7th grader students prefer to solve math problems?. 13th Conference on Mathematics Education, Tehran, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal Of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2014). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587-597.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561.
Saif, A. A. (2017). Modern Educational Psychology, Seventh edition, Tehran; Publishing Douran.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
Skemp, R. (1989). Relational Understanding & Instrumental Understanding. trans: Heydari, R & Gooya, Z.2005. Mathematics Education Journal , 81, 23(1) ,4-15.
Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal For Research In Mathematics Education, 404-411.
Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2010). The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 178.
Vos, p. Goedhart, m.(2011). Derivatives and applications; development of one student’s understanding,. In Proceedings of CERME (Vol. 7).
Yarmohammadian, M.(2006). Principles of curriculum planning (the nature of curriculum-philosophical, psychological and sociological programs, program evaluation, program content analysis or textbook. Publishing yadvare ketab (Book Memorial). Print XIV.
Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PloS one, 13(9), e0204847.
Zarabian, F. (2019). evaluating the effect of electronic content based on the principles of multimedia design on the learning of math and science lessons of sixth elementary school students. Journal of Curriculum Research, 8(2), 48-69. doi: 10.22099/jcr.2019.5119.