Identifying a Model for Creative Activities of Mathematics Students: a Qualitative Research

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor at Department of Mathematics. Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the experience of creative activities of undergraduate students in mathematics and identify a model for better understanding of these activities. Data have been collected using a methodology approach based on grounded theory and semi-structured introspective interviews. The population is all students who study mathematics in one of the universities in Tehran. Thirteen math students volunteered to collaborate with purposeful and theoretical sampling. The data was analyzed through the free and axial coding process. To ensure the quality of research, the credibility, dependability, transferability and conformability criteria were used and the results were given in grounded theory systematic paradigm model which includes phenomenon, causal conditions, strategies, intervening factors, contextual conditions, context and consequences. The model shows there are several affecting factors involved in those activities.

Keywords


Arikan, E. E. (2017). Is There a Relationship between Creativity and Mathematical Creativity? Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 239.
Ajzen, I. (1991), The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol.50, pp.179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013) Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research.
Bahar, A. K. & Maker, C.J. (2011).Exploring the relationship between mathematical creativity and mathematical achievement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 3(1), 33-48.
Bakar, M. N. & Norman, I. (2012).The Role of Metacognitive Abilities in Posing Mathematical Problems. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 1-10.
Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 121-143.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as tool to develop and identify creativity gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37–47.
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five raditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ellwood, S., Pallier, G.,Snyder, A., Gallate,J, (2009). The Incubation Effect: Hatching a Solution? Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 6–14.
Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall, Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42-52). Kluwer Academic Publishers New York.
Haylock, D.W. (1987): A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. – In: Educational Studies in Mathematics. 18 (1), 59–74.
Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Christou, C., & Cleanthous, E. (2012). Predicting Mathematical Creativity.
Kim, K. H. (2009). Creative Problem Solving. In B. Kerr (Ed). Encyclopedia of Giftedness, Creativity and Talent. Sage Publications. . pp. 188-191.
Kiymaz, Y., Sriraman, B., & Lee, K. H. (2012).Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Creativity in Problem Solving. The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics, 173-191.
Kontorovich, I., Koichu, B., Leikin, R., & Berman, A. (2011). Indicators of creativity in mathematical problem posing: How indicative are they?. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on creativity in mathematics education and the education of the gifted students University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia/Angel Kanchev University of Ruse, Ruse, Bulgaria (pp. 120-125).
Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2006).Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.
Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. Working Group 14. Advanced mathematical thinking 2220- 2330.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. (Ch. 9, pp. 129-145). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: what makes the difference?. ZDM, 1-15.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007, July). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In PME CONFERENCE (Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 3).
Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For The Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17-19.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Leung, S. K. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing.ZDM, 29(3), 81-85.
Mann, E. L. (2009). The search for mathematical creativity: Identifying creative potential in middle school students. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 338-348.
Mina, F.(2008). Promoting Creativiy for all students in mathematics educations. Proceedings of the discussing group 9: Promoting Creativity for all students in mathe- maticseducation. In the 11th ICME (Monterrey, Mexico, 2008).
Neumann, C. J. (2007). Fostering creativity—A model for developing a culture of collective creativity in science. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 202–206.
Parker, J. P., & Begnaud, L. G. (2004). Developing creative leadership. Libraries Unlimited.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. School of education, Department of mathematics, University of Colifornia, Brekly, Colifornia. ACADEMIC PRESS. INC.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
Sharma, Y. (2014). The Effects of Strategy and Mathematics Anxiety on Mathematical Creativity of School Students. Mathematics Education, 9(1), 25-37.
Silver, E.A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 29 (3), 75–80.
Sinitsky, I.(2008). Both for teachers and for Students: on some essential features of creativity- stimulating activities. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education Monterrey, Mexico.
Sriraman, B., & Haavold, P. (2017). Creativity and giftedness in mathematics education: A pragmatic view. First compendium for research in mathematics education. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sriraman, B., Haavold, P., & Lee, K. (2013). Mathematical creativity and giftedness: a commentary on and review of theory, new operational views, and ways forward. ZDM, 1-11.
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The International Journal on Mathematics Education [ZDM], 41, 13-27.
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.
Strauss A. & Corbin J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nded. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Tall, D. (1991) (Ed). Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3-21).Kluwer Academic Publishers New York.
Walker, C. (2008). Factors Relating to the Success or Failure of College Algebra Internet Students: A Grounded Theory Study. ProQuest.
Wessels, H. M. (2014). Levels of mathematical creativity in model-eliciting activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(9), 22-40.
Wong, K. Y. (1999). Use of student mathematics questioning to promote active learning and Metacognition. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seoul, Korea.
Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2012). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem-posing abilities. The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics, 5-28