The Content Knowledge of Preservice Elementary Teachers about the Possibility: An Essential Factor in the Effective Teaching of Probability Concepts

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

Introduction: The probability has entered the content of mathematics textbooks of Iranian schools. Simultaneously with the addition of this area of mathematics to the textbooks, it is necessary for the teachers who are responsible for teaching probability concepts to receive the appropriate training for the optimal teaching of these topics. This is because, successful teaching of probability requires adequate preparation of teachers (Batanero & Álvarez-Arroyo, 2024).
    The results of some international studies indicate that teacher training curricula, especially elementary teachers, do not lead to their mastery of probability concepts, as they should (Kurt & Coşkuntuncel, 2020; Ruz et al., 2021; Batanero, 2022; Brückler & Milin Šipuš, 2023). Earlier findings suggest that there are different approaches for dealing with these difficulties, the most common of which is to prioritize the development of preservice teachers of early- or primary-age students content knowledge (Denton, 2023). The acquisition of the main part of content knowledge and knowledge of content education for teachers should happen during the teacher training period. The present study only focuses on preservice elementary teachers, as the first educators who contextualize the concepts of probability in students, to determine at what level they know the concepts of probability and to what extent they are able to correctly solve the problems that include these concepts.
Research questions: At what level of the Structure of Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) model is the understanding of preservice elementary teachers about the probability concepts?
Method: This study is descriptive-survey type. The research population includes all preservice elementary teachers in the Farhangian University campuses of Markazi Province who have successfully completed the Basic Mathematics course. The research sample is 137 preservice elementary teachers from two campuses of Farhangian University in Markazi Province, who were selected by randomized clustering method. The researcher-made tool included four tasks, three of which included more than one question; in fact, students answered nine questions. These tasks were designed based on the participants' understanding of five commonly used probability concepts, namely sample space, probability of event, comparison of probabilities, fairness and conditional probability.  
SOLO model was used to analyze the answers provided by preservice teachers to the test questions. In this way, based on the levels of this model, a framework was adapted by the first researcher and after its review and approval by experts in the field of mathematics education, statistics and curriculum planning, it was used as a tool for categorizing student teachers' answers.
Results: The general results of the data analysis indicate that preservice teachers did not have an acceptable performance in any of the five probability concepts investigated in this study and the relative frequency of complete answers, which is placed at the relational level, in each probability concept, is below 40%. In understanding the concept of sample space, about 31% of the sample group members managed to provide complete answers and were placed at the relational level. In addition, only about 37% of the participants were able to provide an answer at the relational level in response to the questions related to probability calculation. Student teachers' understanding of the fairness of a game was not better, and in this sense, only 27% of all members of the sample group gave a complete answer. In the probability comparison, the lowest complete response rate compared to other probability concepts was observed. Because only about 25% of the participants had provided complete answers. Finally, about 34% of the elementary student teachers had provided an answer at the relational level to the conditional probability questions. The results of this study are in line with Kaedi (2017) and Alonso-Castaño and colleagues (2021), who described the content knowledge of student teachers about probability as unfavorable.
Discussion and Conclusions: In explaining the results obtained from this study, at least two basic factors can be mentioned. The first factor is the educational background of preservice teachers in high school. The second essential factor is the quality and content of basic mathematics instruction at Farhangian University.
Based on the results obtained, the authors suggest that a compensatory math lesson should be defined for preservice teachers who studied humanities in high school, so that these students have more opportunity to learn and master basic math concepts, including probability. In addition, it is necessary for Farhangian University, with sufficient planning and investment, to use experts with experience in the field of mathematics education and teacher training in order to compile a comprehensive resource for the basic mathematics course, which according to the relevant curriculum must include the concepts of probability. moreover, the teachers of this course should pay special attention to the mathematical content of the mentioned source, including probability.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), 1-17.
Alonso-Castaño, M., Alonso, P., Mellone, M., & Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J. (2021). What Mathematical Knowledge Do Prospective Teachers Reveal When Creating and Solving a Probability Problem? Mathematics, 9(24), 1-16.
Álvarez-Arroyo, R., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2024). Probabilistic literacy and reasoning of prospective secondary school teachers when interpreting media news. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-14.‏
Ang, L. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Identifying students’ specific misconceptions in learning probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 3(2), 23-29.
Batanero, C. (2022). Training teachers to teach probability: A promising research area. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 729-734.‏
Batanero, C., & Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2024). Teaching and learning of probability. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(1), 5-17.‏
Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability (pp. 1–33). Springer Nature.‏
Batanero, C., & Diaz, C. (2012). Training school teachers to teach probability: Reflections and challenges. Chilean Journal of Statistics, 3(1), 3–13.
Biggs J, Collis K (1982) Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. Academic, New York.
Biggs, J & Collis, K (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behavior. Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement, 57-76.
Biggs, J & Tang, C (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press. United Kingdom.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2018). Reasoning with risk: Teaching probability and risk as twin concepts. In C. Batanero & E. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics. Advances in probability education research (pp. 3–22). Springer
Brückler, F. M., & Milin Šipuš, Ž. (2023). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ understanding of conditional probability in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 89-104.
Denton, D. (2023). Preparing preservice teachers to teach probability and statistics to early learners: A systematic review. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 14-14.‏
Dollard, C. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers and the fundamentals of probability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 27-47.‏
Eskandari, M., Reyhani, E., & Izadi, M. (2024). The probability concept in elementary mathematics textbooks: An analytical look at the concepts and tasks' cognitive demand levels. A new approach to children's education quarterly, Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 14 July 2024). [Persian]
Eskandari, M., Reyhani, E., Rahimi, Z., & Bahrami Samani, E. (2023). An Analysis of Iranian Junior High School Mathematics Textbooks Based on Different Interpretations of Probability. Journal of Curriculum Research. 13(1), 31-55. [Persian]
Gandhi, H. (2022). Thirty-One Teachers’ Epistemic Beliefs as They Worked with Random Generators: an Explorative Study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 645–658.‏
Gómez-Torres E., Díaz C., Contreras J.M., Ortiz J.J. (2018) Prospective Teachers’ Probabilistic Reasoning in the Context of Sampling. In: Batanero C., Chernoff E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Stochastics. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_20
Higher Council of Education, Ministry of Education, Educational Research and Planning Organization. National curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2013). [Persian]
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for research in mathematics education, 39(4), 372-400.‏
Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ understanding of probabilistic fairness: Analysis of decisions around task design. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 51(7), 997-1019.‏
Kaedi, F. (2017). Evaluating the content knowledge and the pedagogical content knowledge’s grade of preservice mathematics teachers of Farhangian university in probability. (Unpublished masterʼs thesis). Farhangian University, shahid Chamran Campus. [Persian]
Kahaki, A., Reihani, I., & Bahrami Samani, E. (2019). Examining 8th students' understanding of probability. Statistical Thinking. 47, 57-80. [Persian]
Kazak, S., & Leavy, A. (2022). The emerging interplay between subjective and objective notions of probability in young children. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 538-557.‏
Kurt, G. & Coşkuntuncel, O. (2020). Assessment of elementary mathematics teachers’ probability content knowledge in terms of different meanings of probability. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 706-732.
Huerta P.M. (2018). Preparing Teachers for Teaching Probability Through Problem Solving. In: Batanero C., Chernoff E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Stochastics. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham.
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Higher Education Development and Planning Council (Farhangian University). Primary education curriculum (2019). [Persian]
Mooney, E. S., Langrall, C. W., & Hertel, J. T. (2014). A practitional perspective on probabilistic thinking models and frameworks. Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives, 495-507.‏
Paparistodemou, E., & Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M. (2018). Teachers’ reflection on challenges for teaching probability in the early years. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Statistics in early childhood and primary education supporting early statistical and probabilistic thinking (pp. 201–215). Singapore: Springer.
Park, M.J., & Lee, E. (2018). Korean Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Abilities to Identify Equiprobability Bias and Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-19.
Pegg, J. (2018). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) Model. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham
Pegg, J., & Tall, D. (2005). The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. ZDM, 37(6), 468-475.
Savard, A. (2014). Developing probabilistic thinking: What about people’s conceptions? Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives, 283-298.
Shamel, N.(2023). Students’ Misconceptions in Conditional Probability. Unpublished masterʼs thesis). Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Faculty of Science Branch. [Persian]
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(3), 4–14.
Stohl H. (2005). Probability in Teacher Education and Development. In Jones G.A. (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning (pp. 345-366). Springer.