A phenomenological Study on Elementary School Teachers' Experiences About Implementation of the Plan for Identification and Direction of Gifted Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate professor of Bu-Ali Sina university,faculty of humanities (corresponding author)

Abstract

Introduction
 One of the basic principles in any education system is valuing learner’s individual differences and needs and providing them with instruction based on their abilities and talents. Identifying, directing and supporting gifted students has been considered as one of the most significant issues that has been received strong emphasis in higher education documents, including the National Curriculum Framework Document of Iran. Unfortunately, however, due to different reasons, they have been neglected in many education systems. This plan, like any other plan, requires scientific pathology of its essence, content and methods of implementation. Neglecting this vital phenomenon can lead to waste of social capital and loss of students' intellectual abilities. Considering the above problem, the objective of this study was to use a phenomenological approach for identifying perceptions and experiences of elementary school teachers about implementation of the plan for identifying and directing gifted students.
Research question
What are elementary girls' school teachers’ perceptions and experiences about implementation of the plan for identifying and directing gifted students?
Methods
The qualitative approach and, more specifically, descriptive phenomenological method was used for conducting the present study. The research population were all fifth grade teachers of elementary girls' school in Hamedan, Hamadan Province, Iran who were involved in implementation of the plan for identifying and directing gifted students over the academic year 2018-2019. The research sample included 16 teachers who were selected based on criterion sampling and by taking into account the principle of theoretical saturation. The most important criteria for selection of participants were having theoretical and practical knowledge, participation in relevant workshops, and having two years’ experience of implementing the plan for identifying and directing gifted students and five years of working experiences). Semi structured internes with participants were then carried out in order to collect data and each interview took between 25 to 40 minutes. The collected data was next coded. The validity of the obtained data was assessed through calculating Lawshe's content validity ratio. Accordingly, the collected data was presented to eight experts in different fields of study, including curriculum development and educational psychology.  Concerning this, the obtained values were 0.88 for motivational factors, 0.84 for staff and supporting factors, 0.91 for cultural and social factors, 0.89 for instructional factors, and 0.88 for all the factors. As a result, content validity of data was confirmed. For determining credibility of the data, Lincoln and Guba's criteria were used. Accordingly, the interview process took place with a focus on the research objectives and questions. In addition, in order to make a correct interpretation of interviews, the results concerning teachers' perspectives were presented to participants and the identified misconception were corrected. Transferability of data was assessed through the use of different sources of data, for instance through listening to participants' narratives and interviewing them, constant reviewing of data, benefitting from environmental triangulation, and having external check.
Results: Based on research findings, teachers perceptions' and experiences were classified into four organizing themes, namely motivational, staff and supporting, instructional, and social and cultural themes. Moreover, 31 basic themes were identified in relation to these organizing themes. The motivational dimension included themes such as indifferences between teachers involved in implementation of the plan for identifying and directing gifted students and other teachers, assumption of imposed additional work by teachers, and benefits like scientific visits and field trip. In staff and supporting dimension, basic themes included lack of monitoring for implementation of plan, uncertainty about future of the plan and implementation of multiple simultaneous plans. Some basic themes in cultural and social dimension were conflict perspectives among the relevant practitioners and experts, lack of coordination between families and teachers, unawareness of family, inadequate information presented by social media, stereotype believes, and inadequate information about the existing differences between the plan and gifted schools' mission. The instructional dimensions included themes such as impractical workshop, use of unqualified educators for in-service education, unawareness of assessment tools, and number of students in each classroom.
Discussion: Based on the findings, teachers had some unpleasant perception and experiences for identifying and directing gifted students and the most unpleasant experiences were caused by instructional problems. In fact, it should be stated that there was no clear and comprehensive plan for directing student talent at elementary schools. Schools do not prepare students for accepting responsibility. They only prepare student to achieve higher levels of education and encourage them to compete with their peers. Overall, replacing product-centered, competition- and score-based instruction with creativity, self-initiation, self-discovery, curiosity and self-motivation requires comprehensive interaction between the country's National Elites Foundation, Organization for Gifted and Talented Education, the Office of Gifted and Talented Students, society, family, teachers and principals.

Keywords

References

 
Abedi, A. (2015). The instrument of identifying and directing talent student design, Journal of talented, (74):144-154(Persian).
Abu, N. K., Akkanat, Ç. & Gökdere, M. (2017). Teachers' Views about the Education of Gifted Students in Regular Classrooms. Turkish Journal of Giftedness & Education, 7(2), 87-109.
Al Hajjat, A. T. (2017). The Level of Career Success for Talented Students and Its Relation with Gender, Center and Educational Level, International Education Studies; 10( 5): 197-203
Alzoubi, S. M. (2014). Effects of Enrichment Programs on the Academic Achievement of Gifted and Talented Students. Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness. (2)2, 22-27.
Al-zoubi, S. M .& Abdolrahman, M. S. B. (2016). Talented students satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers, Journal for education of gifted young scientists,4(1):1-20.
Amopour, N. (2017). The study of students individual differences in SHAHAB design .journal of education and psychology studies,(18):49-69(in Persian).
Ateş, H. K. (2018). Gifted children metaphor from the perspective of teachers and parents. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(2), 30-41.
Bildiren, A. (2017). Examination of the skill areas of gifted children using WISC-R intelligence scale score. European Journal of Education Studies, (3)9,28-36.
Bildiren, A. (2019). Option of primary school teachers on the definition, identification and education of gifted children. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, (9)33.
Boichenko, M. (2016). The terminological toolkit of comparative pedagogical research of gifted students’ education in the United States, Canada and the UK. (6), 221-230.
Brumand, N. (2001). Pathology of participant management in organization, Tadbir monthly, (115):24-31( Persian).
Cengel, M. & Alkan, A. (2018). Problems Faced by Teachers of Gifted/Talented Students. Tukish Jurnal of Giftedness & Education, Copyright © International Conference on New Horizons in Education Conference (INTE), (2),400-406.
Cheraghi, Z., Nejat, S. N., Pasalar, P., Babaki, V. & Ahmadi, N. S. (2020). Determining the actual situation and talent student expectations, A qualitative research, Journal of Qualitative research in health science, (4):395-406(Persian).
Dadar, L. (2018). The pathology of girl junior border school curriculum, Sarpool Zohab city (case study), M.A.Thsis,Bu-Ali Sina university. (Persian).
Gagne, F. (2015). Academic talent development programs: a best practices model, Asia Pacific Educ. Rev,16(2):281–295.
Gamer, M. & abdelkarimhadi, A. (2017). Al-majalat dulatiyah Al-tathvir tafavogh, Problems Facing Gifted and Talented Students from the Teachers’ Perspective in Basic Schools in Addamer City- Sudan ,8(14):181-195.
García-Guardia, M. L., Ayestarán-Crespo, R., López-Gómez, J. E. & Tovar-Vicente, M. (2019). Educating the gifted student: Eagerness to achieve as a curricular competence. (15)60,19-28.
Hakimzadeh, R. (2019). Identifying and directing talent student desighn, ministry of education, Deputy of primary education, Mehr Press. (Persian).
Hamzehlo, Z. & Moghddasi, Y. (2017). The study of the importance of implementing shahab design in primary school, third international conference on new horizons in education and social problems, Tehran: Association of new horizon of science and technology. (Persian).
Higher council of education office. (2012). National curriculum of Islamic republic of Iran, Tehran: Higher council of education office with cooperation of educational planning and research organization.
Islami, Z. (2012). Need assessment of gifted student of Brigand secondary school in order to enrichment of their curriculum, M.A Thesis, Brigand university. (Persian).
Johnson, S. (2013). National challenges in providing services to gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 5-6. (Persian).
Karimnia, K. & HosseinZadeh, O. A. (2017). Assessment of SHAHAB design effectiveness based on parents ,deputies and principals .First conference world and Iran modern research  in management and calculating, Shiraz applied and scientific university. (Persian).
Khmanei, S. A. (2011). Sayings of Islamic republic of iran leadership in fifth elicits national conference with the subject of elicits responsibility in decade of progress and justice,13/7/2010(Persian).
Majdfar, M., Aslani, E. & Salighehdar, L. (2015). Shahab handbook, First Edition ,Tehran: school publication. (Persian).
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2003). Theory of multiple intelligence and its implications for instruction and curriculum, Journal of education,(88):7-31(Persian).
Mohajerani, F. (2020). Attempt for student entrance to international society. Tehran: National center of talented student and young researchers. (Persian).
Najafi, S. (2015). Identifying and directing talent student design, Tehran, primary education national conference. (Persian).
Nastoh, M. (2015). Answer to some question about identifying and directing talent student design, journal of talent student ,14(74):28-35. (Persian).
Navidi, A. (2020). Preliminary evaluation of implementing identifying and directing talent student design. Journal of education,13(137):51-82. (Persian).
Needham, V. (2012). Primary teachers’ perceptions of the social and emotional aspects of gifted and talented education. APEX. The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 17(1), 1-18.
Taghipourkran, H. (2018). Assessment, critic and reviewing Iranian educational system due to identifying and directing talent student according to national high document, fifth  national conference of school psychology ,Tehran: Iranian educational psychology association. (Persian).
Veladat, F. & Navehebrahim, A. (2011). Designing a model for managing talents of students in elementary school: A qualitative study based on grounded theory, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29 (201) 1052 – 1060. (Persian).
 Veluchamy, R., Sachin Roy, S. & Krishnan, A. R. (2017). Managing Talents of Generation Z Students Talent Management, I J C T A, 9(37), 403-409.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 22 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 28 July 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics