الف. فارسی
1. ابوالقاسمی، عباس. و نریمانی، محمد. ( 1384). آزمونهای روان شناختی. اردبیل: انتشارات باغ رضوان.
2. بحرانی، محمود. (1372). بررسی رابطه انگیزش تحصیلی و عادات مطالعه گروهی از دانشآموزان متوسطه شیراز. رسالهی کارشناسی ارشد. شیراز: دانشگاه شیراز.
3. صالحی، ساناز. (1388). بررسی انگیزش تحصیلی در گونههای مختلف خانواده بر اساس مدل فرآیند محتوای خانواده. رسالهی کارشناسی ارشد. شیراز: دانشگاه شیراز.
ب. انگلیسی
4. Akkoyunlu, B. Yilmaz, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners' view on blended learning and its implementation process. Internet and Higher Education. 11(1): 26-32.
5. Armestrong, P., Elliot, T., Ronald, J. & Paterson, R. (2009). Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in UKemergency department. Europian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 16(6): 327-9.
6. Allen, M. (2007). Designing successful e-learning. New York: John Wiley and sons, Inc.
7. Bonk, C. J., & Zhang, K. (2008). Empowering Online learning. USA. New York: Jossey- Bass.
8. Banaccio, S., & Reeve, C. (2010). The nature and relalative importance of students' perceptions of the sources of test anxiety. Learning and Individual Learning. 20(6): 617-625.
9. Carbonaro, M. (2008). Integration of e-learning technology in an interprofessional heath science course. Medical Teacher.
30(1): 25-33.
10. Crouch, M. A. (2009). Advanced Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy course blending on line and face to face instruction. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 27(3): 51-73.
12. Furstenau, B. Y. (2008). Exploration of an Industrial Enterprise as a Method of boundary-using vocational Education. In Tuomi-Gröhn, Tertlu and Engeström: Between school and work new perspective on transfer and boundary-crossing. (pp:85-119), United Kingdom: Emerald.
13. Galea , J., Legarreta, J. L., Martí, A., & Gisbert, M .(2002). On the design of learning contents for 3d virtual environments. Proceedings of ICTE. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education. Information Society and Education: Monitoring a Revolution.Spain. ISBN 84-95251-70-0.
14. Gulikers, J. T. M., Kester, L., Kirchner, P. A., & Bastians. T. J. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perception of assessment, Authenticity, study approach and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction. 18(2): 172-186.
15. Halse, K., & Hage, A. (2006). An acute hospital ward densely populated with students during a 12 week clinical period. Journal of Nurse Educator. 45(4):133-6.
16. Hassandra, M., Goudas, M. & Chroni, S.t. (2003). Examining factors Associated with intrinsic Motivation in physical education: a qualitatioe approach. Phychology of Sport and Exercise. 4: 211-223.
17. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design Framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development. 48(3): 23-48.
18. Hsiao, C. (2008). The design and development of personal Digital Interface for location based learning system. URN etd-0710108-221137.
20. Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teacher's feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 4(4): 333-346.
21. Lameras, P., & paraskakis, I. (2007). Pedagogy and tools for
E-learning practice Informatics. Proceeding of the informatic Education Europe II Conference, South-East European Research Center: 304-293.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2008). Situated learning legimated peripheral participation. United Kingdom: Cambridge university Press.
23. Lok, B. (2006). Applying virtual reality in medical communication education: Current findings and potential teaching and benefits of immersive virtual patients. Virtual Reality. 10(3-4): 185-195.
24. Lunce, M. (2006). Simulation: Bringing the benefits of situated learning to traditional classroom. Journal of Applied Educational Technology. 4(1): 37-45.
25. Lux, L.R., Russel, M.L., Nelles, L.J., & Smith, C.M. (2009). ScaffoldingKnowledgeBuildingin a web based communication and cultural competence program for international Medical graduates. Academic Medicine. 84(10): 55-58.
26. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., & Kemp, J.E. (2007). Designing effective instruction. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27. Nguyen, H.T. (2006). Constructing expertness: a novice pharmacist's development of interaction competence in patient consultation. Communication and Medicine. 3(2): 147-160.
28. Oriol, M. D., Tumulty, G., & Snyder, K. (2010). Cognitive Apprenticeship as a framework for teaching Online. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 6(1): 210-217.
29. Putwin, D. W., & Daniels, R.A. (2010). Is the relationship between competence belief and test anxiety influenced by goal orientation. Learning and Individual Differences. 20(1): 8-11.
30. Quaintance, J. L., & Arnold, L. (2010). What students learn about professionalism from faculty stories: an "appreciative inquiry" approach. Academic Medicine. 85(1): 118-123.
31. Refat, R. M., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Learning about shape semantics: a situated learning approach. Proceedings of third conference on computer aided architectural design research inAsia. Osaka: Osaka University. pp: 375-384.
32. Richardson, B. (1999). Professional development. Physiotherapy. 85(9): 467-474.
33. Rieger, V. M. (2009). Effective acquisition of basic surgical techniques through blended learning. Chirung. 80(6): 537-43.
34. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully Online graduate course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 5, 2, ISSN: 1492-3831.
35. Sanden, J. V., & Teurlings, C. (2008). Developing competence during practice period: the learner's perspective. In Tuomi-Gröhn, tertlu and Engeström. Between school and work new perspective on transfer and boundary-crossing. (pp:110-137), United Kingdom: Emerald.
36. Schutt, M. (2007). The effects of instructor immediacy in Online learning environment. University of sandrago. AAT 3301290.
37. Serrano, H. M., Gonzalez, S. M. & Munoz, R. J. (2009). Designing learning environments improving social interactions: essential variables for virtual training space. Procedural Social and Behavioral Science. 1: 2411-2415.
38. Shaikhi Fini, A., & Khajehzadeh Fini, H. (2010). A comparison effect of group counseling methods, behavioral, cognitive and cognitive behavioral to reduce students test anxiety in university of Hormozgan. Procedural Social and Behavioral Science. 5: 2256-2261.
39. Smith, P. J. (2003). Workplace learning and flexible delivery. Review of Educational Research. 73)1): 53-88.
40.Smith, l., & laurd, L. (2010). Exploring the advantages of blended instruction at community colleges and technical schools. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 6(2): 508-515.
41. So, J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student's perception of collaborative learning environment: Relationship and critical factors. Computer and Education. 51(1): 318-336.
42. Stalmeijer, R. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship in chemical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 14(4): 535-546.
43. Standal, Ø. F., & Jespersen, E. (2008). Peers as resources for learning: a situated learning approach to adapted physical activity in rehabilitation. Adapted Physical Activity, Quartery. 25(3): 208-227.
44. Steinmayer, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences. 19: 80-90.
45.Stoeber, J., Feast, A.R., & Hayward, J. A. (2009). Self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism: Differential relationship and text anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences. 47: 423-428.
46. Sung, Y.H., Kauon, I.G., & Rya, E. (2008). Blended Learning on Medication administration for new nurses: Integration of e-learning and face to face instruction classroom. Nurse Education Today. 28(8): 943-952.
47. Unal, C., & Inan, H. Z. (2010). Student's perception of a situated learning environment. Procedural Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(2): 2171-2175.
48. Walker, C. O., Greene, B.A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academic intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences. 6(1): 1-12.
49. Wang, M. (2010). Online Collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australian Journal of Education Technology. 26(6): 830-846.
50. Weltering ,V.; Tlerrier, A. ; Spitzer, K. and Spreckelsen C. (2009). Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem based learning process: results of mixed-method evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 14(5): 725-38.
51. West, C., Stain, C., Sanbom, W., & Volicer, B. (2009). Computer-based simulation in blended learning curriculum for Hazardous waste site worker health and safety training. International Journal of Information Communication Technology Education. 5(1): 62-73.
52. Yushau, B. (2006). The effects of blended E-learning on Mathematics and computer attitudes in pre-calculus Algebra. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiant. 3(2): 176-183.
)