ارائه مدل توضیحی ادراک دانشجویان از کیفیت مسؤولیت¬های استادان، برنامه‌ی ‌درسی پنهان و دستاوردهای آنان از تحصیل در دانشگاه

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف کلی از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی کیفیت مسؤولیت‌های استادان، ادراک دانشجویان از برنامه‌ی ‌درسی پنهان و دستاوردهای آنان از تحصیل در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس می باشد. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش تمامی دانشجویان ورودی سال تحصیلی 89-90 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس و تمامی استادان شاغل در این دانشگاه بوده است. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه­ای مرحله­ای 581 نفر دانشجو و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده 117 نفر از استادان به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسش‌نامه کیفیت مسؤولیت­های استادان، پرسش‌نامه‌ی ادراک دانشجویان از برنامه‌ی ‌درسی پنهان و پرسش‌نامه‌ی دستاوردهای دانشجویان بود که بین دانشجویان توزیع گردید هم چنین از پرسش‌نامه‌ی دستاوردهای دانشجویان نیز استفاده شد که در اختیار استادان قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که: متغیرهای برون‌زاد تدریس، نظارت، خدمات اجتماعی و پژوهش گری پیش‌بینی کننده‌ی مثبت و معنادار دستاوردهای دانشجویان از تحصیل می باشند. متغیرهای تدریس، نظارت، خدمات اجتماعی و پژوهش‌گری پیش‌بینی کننده‌های مثبت و معنادار متغیرهای ساختار دانشگاه و ارتباط متقابل استادان و دانشجویان و پیش‌بینی کننده‌ی منفی و معنادار متغیر روابط میان فردی دانشجویان با یک دیگرمی باشند. کنترل متغیرهای برون‌زاد نشان داد که متغیرهای ساختار دانشگاه، ارتباط متقابل استادان و دانشجویان و نیز روابط میان فردی دانشجویان با یک دیگر به‌طور مستقیم پیش‌بینی کننده‌ی معنادار متغیرهای دستاوردهای دانشجویان از تحصیل می باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


الف. فارسی

بلوم، بی اس (1363). ویژگی‌های آدمی و یادگیری آموزشی. ترجمه علی اکبر سیف،  تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.

 

ب. انگلیسی

Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: a critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ausbrooks, R. (2000). What is schools hidden curriculum teaching your child?[Online].www.Parentingteens.com/curriculum.shtml. [8 Aug 2012]

Avendano, J. (2003). Student involvement: assessing student satisfaction, gains, and quality of effort. Doctoral dissertation.University of Illinois state, School of education.

Bridges, B. K., Cambridge, B., Kuh, G. D., &Leegwater, L. H. (2005).Student engagement at minority serving institutions: emerging lessons from the BEAMS project. In G. H. Gaither (Ed.), what works: achieving success in minority retention? New Directions for Institutional research.SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

Carini, M. Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the Linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1): 1-32.

Chikeung, Ch. (2008). The effect of shared decision-making on the improvement in teacher’s Job development.[Online].http://www.eric.ed.gov. [26 May 2012]

Doganay, A. (2009), Hidden curriculum on gaining the value of respect for human dignity. A qualitative study in two elementary schools in Adana.[Online]. http://www.Educationalsciencestheory& practice.com. [26 May 2012]

Eimers, M. T. (2001). The Impact of student experiences on progress in college: an examination of minority and nonminority differences. Naspa journal, 38(3): 25- 40.

Fizroy community school.(2007). Faculty attitudes toward academic freedom.[Online].http://www.fcs,vie,edu.au/artides.asp. [19 Feb 2012].

Gatto, J.T. (1997). Eyeless in Gaza; part 1: Sole. The Journal of Alternative Education, 14(1): 23-34.

Graham, S. &Gisi, S. (2000). Adult undergraduate students: what role does college involvement play? NASPA Journal, 38(1): 99-121.

Groff, J. &Mouza.J. (2008). A framework for addressing Challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1): 21-46.

Hall, D. (2004). A comparative study of perceptions of participants and non-participants in a campus recreation program on the quality of students’ college experiences.Doctoral dissertations.University of California.[On line].Abstract available at:http://proquest.Umi.com. [17 Sep 2011].

Hardy, L. S. (2005). Linear relationship between campus environment, involvement and educational outcomes at tribally controlled community college. Doctoral dissertation.University of Memphis, College of education.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [17 Sep 2011].

Irungu, J. N. (2010). The relationship between engagement and perceived academic, personal, and social outcomes for senior international undergraduate students in research universities.Doctoral dissertation.University of Kansas, School of Education.

Konrad, C. (2002). The relationship of nursing student quality of effort, satisfaction, and self- reported perceptions of learning gains in associate degree nursing programs in specialized colleges. Doctoral dissertation.University of Illinois state, Department of educational administration and foundations.

Kuh, G. D. (1999). How are we doing? Tracking the quality of the undergraduate experience, 1960s to the present.The Review of Higher Education, 22(2): 99-120.

Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Journal of Change Management, 33(3): 10- 66.

Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: benchmarks for effective educational practices. Journal of Change Management, 35(2), 24-32.

Kuh, G. D. (2005). Putting student engagement results to use: Lessons from the field.Higher Education, 55 (1): 12- 13.

Kuh, G. D. & Hu, S. (2001). The relationships between computer and information technology use, selected leaming and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 42: 217-232.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J. & Associates (2005).Student Success in College: creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N. & Pace, C. R. (1997).College student experiences questionnaire: revised norms for the third edition. Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.

Koljatic, M. &Kuh, G. D. (2001).A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education.Higher Education, 42 (3): 351-371.

Lohman, G. A. (2003). The relationships of select student characteristic, institutional characteristic, environmental measures and student effort on self-reported college gains for first-generation first-year undergraduate students at public four-year institutions.Doctoral dissertation.University of Green State, College of Bowling.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [28 Apr 2012].

Margolis, E. (2001). The hidden curriculum in higher education, [On line].http://books.google.com. [27 Jan 2011].

Mccluskey-Titus, P. (1996). A Study of the Relationship between Student Involvement in the Collegiate Experience and Learning Outcomes.Doctoral Dissertation.University of Florida State, Department of Educational Leadership.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [27 Jan 2011].

Miller, E. V. (2008). Perceived relation of adult community college students between quality of effort and outcome gains: adult students at one community college. Doctoral dissertation, University of missouri-columbia, School of education.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [22 Feb 2012].

Meyers, R. L. (2001). Persistence of technical degree seekers.Unpublished doctoral dissertation.University of Memphis, School of education.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [18 Jan 2011].

Moser, L. G. (2001). Factors influencing community college students’ estimate of knowledge gains.Doctoral dissertation.University of Texas A & M.

Myles, B.S. and Andreon, D. (2001).Asperger syndrome and adolescence: practicul solutions for school success Shawnee mission, KS. Autism asperger publishing co.

Ornestein, A.C. Hunkins, F.P. (1993). Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issues. (Second Ed). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Pascarella, E. T. &Terenzini, P. T. (2006).How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Pig, T. L. (2000). Student effort: Impact on community college transfer and vocational students’ academic achievement. Doctoral Dissertation.Univerity of Memphis.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [16 Jan 2011].

Pittman, C. J. (2003). A study of the relationship between college student experiences and achievement.Doctoral Dissertation.College of William and Mary in Virginia, Department ofeducational administration and higher education.[On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [16 Jan 2011].

Rios, V. A. (2010). Community college transfer students’ reflections of their needs, expectations, and persistence at private four-year institutions. Doctoral dissertation. University of San Francisco, Department of leadership studies organization and leadership program, Faculty of the school of education. [On line]. Abstract available at: http://proquest.Umi.com. [10 May 2011].

Thornberg, R. (2009). The moral construction of the Good pupil Embedded in school rules. Journal ofEducation, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4 (3): 245-261.

Tinto, V. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In j. smart, higher education.Handbook of Theory and Research, 3(5): 77-118.

Turner, J.C. (2008). Understanding young adolescent’s optimal experiences in academic settings. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77 (2): 125- 131.

Vallance, E. (1991). Hidden Curriculum.The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. New York: Elsevier Science pub Co.

Williams, J.M. (2007). College student experiences questionnaire research program.47th annual forum of the association for institutional research. Kansas city, MO.

Yeh, H. (2004). College student experiences among Asian international graduates students at the University of Denver. Doctoral dissertation.University of Denver, College of education.

Zhao, C. M., Kuh, G. D., &Carini, R. M. (2005).A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices.The journal of Higher Education, 76(2): 209-231.